Conference Theme

Communication in a Challenged World: From Division to Connection

Key Questions

  • How can communication practices foster meaningful dialogue across social and political divides?
  • What strategies reinforce trust in democratic institutions and strengthen resilience against disinformation, propaganda, and hate speech, and how can new AI technologies contribute to these strategies?
  • How do we build inclusive information ecosystems in which structurally marginalized voices are heard, and what is the role of different technological affordances in strengthening and undermining them?
  • What do current sociopolitical ruptures and divides demand from communication research, theory, and practice?

To address these questions, the overarching theme of the conference is further divided into six interconnected subthemes:

Legacy media is losing ground while platform-native news formats and peripheral actors are becoming increasingly present and powerful in the information landscape. Political pressures in newsrooms and ownership concentration further threaten journalistic independence. At the same time, independent and audience-funded media are emerging with unprecedented momentum. Finally, the rise and proliferation of AI-generated content, including but not limited to deepfakes, creates further challenges for journalistic practitioners. These challenges are particularly pronounced in the case of Switzerland with its distinct multilingual media ecosystem and the rapid scale of adoption of new technologies.

This subtheme invites research on how journalists navigate disinformation ecosystems, rebuild source credibility, and adapt to professional norms under political pressure and economic precarity.

Key Questions

  • How do journalists maintain independence under political and corporate pressure?
  • What reporting practices effectively counter information pollution without amplifying it?
  • How does journalism contribute to democratic resilience?
  • What models sustain quality journalism in under-resourced contexts?

As algorithmically curated feeds and AI-generated content start dominating information environments, the cultivation of critical media literacies becomes urgent. Media socialization increasingly occurs outside formal institutions, shaped by peers, platforms, and influencers, which also opens critical avenues for research around old and new ways of social media use among the younger and older generation and its implications for wellbeing. Finally, access to quality media education varies dramatically across geographies, socioeconomic contexts, and demographic groups, leading to unequal opportunities for critical media engagement.

This subtheme explores how education systems, families, and communities can equip citizens, especially younger generations, to engage constructively with contested information environments, and how they can either reproduce or disrupt existing inequalities in media literacy and education.

Key Questions

  • What media literacy interventions help reduce susceptibility to information pollution?
  • How do sociodemographics shape media socialization outcomes?
  • Can digital media education foster cross-cutting exposure rather than reinforce echo chambers?
  • What role do informal educators and influencers play in shaping media norms?

Regulatory frameworks designed for the broadcast era are straining under platform capitalism and transnational information flows. Historical analysis reveals how media structures have always reflected and reinforced social hierarchies as well as how they can be contested. Today, debates over platform regulation, public media funding, and digital sovereignty carry high democratic stakes.

This subtheme examines policy responses to fragmentation and the structural conditions enabling or constraining pluralism.

Key Questions

  • What historical patterns of media development and collective memories shape current divisions, and how do these continue to affect contemporary communication?
  • What regulatory models best balance free expression, platform accountability, and pluralism?
  • What is the future of public service media in an era of streaming and platform dominance?
  • How do North-South asymmetries shape global communication governance?

Political communication is being transformed by populist rhetoric, strategic disinformation, and the migration of political discourse to social platforms. From microtargeting to astroturfing, new techniques weaponize division while eroding the shared epistemic ground democratic deliberation requires. In the case of Switzerland, these risks are amplified by the increasing risks of foreign interference (e.g., in the form of disinformation and propaganda campaigns), particularly as the country remains a common host of key events associated with international politics.

This subtheme explores how political actors, movements, and institutions communicate in an age of polarization, across different platforms and audiences.

Key Questions

  • How do populist and authoritarian actors exploit fragmented media ecosystems?
  • What role does political communication play in constructing or dissolving trust?
  • How can deliberative formats be designed to bridge partisan divides?
  • What effects do algorithmic amplification or microtargeting have on political discourse?

Audiences are neither passive recipients nor fully autonomous interpreters: they are shaped by social context, identity, and platform affordances and increasingly by AI systems that curate, summarize, or even produce content. We welcome work examining how generative AI alters reception, from examining trust in those systems to emotional attachment (e.g., do AI-personalized messages feel more or less authentic?) to the very nature of "exposure" when AI mediates what is seen and how. Research on selective exposure, echo chambers, and cross-cutting engagement challenges simplistic narratives about media effects and offers insight into the conditions under which communication bridges divides.

This subtheme calls for empirical and theoretical work on how diverse audiences engage with, reject, or transform mediated messages.

Key Questions

  • Under what conditions does exposure to opposing views reduce rather than intensify polarization, and how does AI-recommended or AI-generated content compare to human produced ones?
  • How do marginalized audiences resist, reinterpret, or reclaim dominant media narratives?
  • What is the actual reach and impact of disinformation on political attitudes and behavior?
  • How do trust, identity, and emotion mediate audience reception across different social groups?
  • Much media consumption now happens in "invisible" spaces—podcasts, private messaging, AI assistants. How should we conduct research in these hybrid environments? And how does this research gap affect regulatory decisions regarding especially newly and rapidly developing technologies such as AI, especially in a small, multilingual country like Switzerland?

Organizations occupy a distinctive position within today's fragmented communication landscape: as employers, as public-facing institutions, and as actors with growing responsibility for the information ecosystems they participate in. Strategic communication is increasingly called upon not only to inform but to rebuild trust — internally among employees navigating uncertainty and change, and externally among stakeholders and publics confronted with disinformation, polarization, and declining confidence in institutions. This challenge takes on particular significance in Switzerland, where direct democracy, linguistic and cultural diversity, and a tradition of social partnership place distinct demands on how organizations communicate with and involve their stakeholders. At the same time, organizations themselves must adapt to disruptive technological shifts, including the growing integration of artificial intelligence into communication practice, while critically examining the risks these tools pose to credibility, transparency, and trust.

This subtheme explores how organizational communication can serve as a bridge-building force amid social and political divides — fostering dialogue, resilience, and inclusion both within organizations and in their relationships with broader society.

Key Questions

  • How can organizational communication rebuild trust among employees and stakeholders in times of social and political division?
  • What role do organizations play in countering false information and strengthening informed public discourse?
  • How are communication professionals adapting their practices and skills to navigate AI-driven transformations?
  • How can strategic communication help organizations support inclusion and give voice to structurally marginalized stakeholders?
  • What responsibilities do organizations bear in shaping social cohesion through their communicative practices, particularly in a small, multilingual, and politically decentralized country like Switzerland?